In short: NIS 2 is not an IT project, but one of governance, risk and continuity, with explicit management accountability. The steps to compliance and how to choose the right provider.
What a manager needs to know about NIS 2
NIS 2 is NOT an IT project. It is a governance, risk and business continuity project, with a direct impact on:
- management accountability;
- operational functioning;
- the relationship with suppliers;
- the ability to handle major incidents.
Management is explicitly responsible for:
- approving security measures;
- allocating resources;
- overseeing implementation;
- reporting incidents.
Lack of compliance = fines + corrective measures + reputational risk + real operational risk.
The steps to compliance
Step 1 – Confirming legal scope
Key questions for management:
- Are we an entity within the scope of NIS 2? YES/NO – if YES, the next steps follow.
- Are we an essential or an important entity?
- What critical services do we deliver?
- What impact would a major incident have?
Outcome: a formal NIS 2 applicability decision, owned at leadership level.
Step 2 – Registration and initial assessment
- registering the entity in line with DNSC requirements;
- assessing the risk level (using the tools provided by the authority);
- taking inventory of critical systems, services and suppliers.
Outcome: a clear picture of real exposure, not assumptions.
Step 3 – Gap analysis (where we are vs. what the law requires)
The following are analysed, in documented form:
- security governance;
- policies and procedures;
- existing technical measures;
- incident management;
- the relationship with suppliers;
- operational continuity.
Note: a purely IT audit is insufficient. The analysis must include processes, decisions and responsibilities.
Outcome: a gap analysis report with clear priorities. This makes it possible to identify what is critical to implement and what can be planned for later phases — predictability for investments and for the necessary resources (financial, human, etc.).
Step 4 – Implementing technical and organisational measures
Organisational (mandatory):
- security policies approved by management;
- clear roles and responsibilities;
- an incident management procedure;
- a procedure for reporting to DNSC;
- training for management and key personnel (annual training plan, attendance records, tests to gauge how well employees have taken on the new information);
- supplier control (periodic assessments, NDA, SLA, DPA).
Technical (adapted to the risk):
- access and identity control;
- network and endpoint security;
- backup and recovery;
- monitoring and logging;
- protection against common attacks;
- testing of the implemented measures: penetration tests, vulnerability scans, continuity plans, disaster recovery plans — tested and proven to work (reports, evidence).
Outcome: a functional system, not decorative documentation.
See where you stand, in a few minutes: on the
askGDPR.ro platform you can run a
free self-assessment of your GDPR compliance and
chat with an AI assistant about data protection. The platform generates and keeps your records up to date (ROPA, LIA, DPIA) and covers document review, website security analysis, privacy and cookie policies, training management, compliance questionnaires, DPO details and the relationship with the supervisory authority (ANSPDCP), an incident register, security measures and international transfers.
Step 5 – Testing, exercises, validation
- incident tests (simulations, table-top exercises);
- crisis simulations;
- verifying the reporting flow;
- corrections where bottlenecks appear.
Outcome: the organisation knows what to do in a real incident.
Step 6 – Continuous monitoring
- periodic reviews of security measures;
- monitoring and detection of security incidents, including through SIEM solutions and in-house or outsourced SOC services (where the risk analysis justifies it);
- updates following operational and technological changes;
- oversight of suppliers and outsourced services;
- periodic reporting to management / the board.
Outcome: sustainable compliance, not a "one-off" project.
How management chooses the right provider for NIS 2
This is where most money is lost.
What a good NIS 2 provider is NOT:
- "We'll get you ISO / NIS done fast";
- an exclusive focus on IT;
- does not talk to management;
- only delivers standard documents;
- avoids the subject of management accountability.
Clear selection criteria (a managerial checklist):
- Understands the legislation, not just the technology. A direct question: "How do you help us meet our legal responsibilities as management?" If the answer is technical → red flag.
- An integrated approach (legal – organisational – technical). Look for providers that translate legal requirements into business decisions, adapt the measures to the size and risk of the organisation, and work with management, not just with IT.
- A clear, phased methodology. The provider must be able to explain what it does in the first 30 / 60 / 90 days, what it delivers concretely at each stage, and what remains your responsibility.
- Real experience, not promises. Ask for examples of similar projects, real (anonymised) deliverables and who will actually do the work, not who does the selling.
- Transfer of control to the organisation. A good provider makes you autonomous, explains the risks and does not create artificial dependence.
What management should receive as final deliverables
- a formal compliance decision;
- a clear risk map;
- policies and procedures that are owned;
- proportionate technical measures;
- a tested incident response plan;
- a functional reporting mechanism;
- control over suppliers;
- continuous visibility at board level.
Keep in mind
NIS 2 is not about "whether". It is about "how well". Organisations that treat NIS 2 as a strategic exercise:
- reduce real risks;
- protect their continuity;
- gain trust (partners, customers, authorities).
Those that treat it as a formality will discover the costs at exactly the wrong moment.
Frequently asked questions
What is NIS 2 and who does it apply to?
NIS 2 is the European directive on the security of network and information systems, transposed into national law. It applies to entities in sectors considered critical or important — energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, public administration, manufacturing, postal services and others — above certain size thresholds. It is not an IT project, but one of governance, risk and business continuity, with explicit management accountability.
What is the difference between essential and important entities?
Both categories must apply the same security measures, but the supervision and enforcement regime differs. Essential entities (typically the largest ones and those in high-impact sectors) are subject to proactive supervision, including ex-ante controls, and to higher maximum fines. Important entities are supervised mainly ex post, after an incident or a complaint. The actual classification depends on the sector, the size of the organisation and the criticality of the services.
What is management's accountability under NIS 2?
Management is explicitly responsible: it approves the security measures, allocates the necessary resources, oversees implementation and is accountable for incident reporting. Members of the management bodies are also required to follow training in cybersecurity risk management. Failure to meet these obligations can trigger the personal liability of management, in addition to the fines imposed on the organisation.
What does a company need to do to be NIS 2 compliant?
The practical steps are: confirming the legal scope and the category (essential or important), registering the entity and carrying out an initial risk assessment, running a gap analysis against the requirements of the law, implementing the organisational and technical measures, testing and validating them through exercises and, finally, continuous monitoring. Compliance is not a one-off project but a sustainable process, supported by an integrated approach — legal, organisational and technical.
Preparing your organisation for NIS 2?
We help you with an integrated approach — legal, organisational and technical — so that compliance becomes functional, not decorative.